We are now, apparently, at a standstill, and we have to wonder if the town is going to abandon this project due to cost and public sentiment. The question is do we want to keep on studying the lake, or do we want to move forward with the work that must be done. The Lost Lake Sewer Committee was established in 2008 to recommend options to the Board of Selectman on how to solve identified problems that have been documented through the years in multiple studies beginning in the 1970’s. All of these previous studies, and the most recent one, indicated that a comprehensive solution to the wastewater problem in the lakes region of Groton was needed. The majority of the houses on the lake were built on small lots and many are too close to the lake. Therefore, the ability to install Title 5 septic systems without variances is nearly impossible.
The town has spent the last four years and $750,000 working on this project. At the spring 2009, fall 2010, and fall 2011 town meetings, articles requesting funds for the project were presented and approved. No one requested more additional nutrient testing. Only when the project was in the final phase, was the request made to move the project back to the information gathering stage.
The benefits of a public sewer project in the Lost Lake area have already been presented: the sewer will protect both personal wells and the town drinking water supply; it will reduce the nutrient loading in the lake and the watershed; and it will provide a lower cost method of meeting individual title 5 requirements for home owners. In addition, there is the potential for further economic development at the four corners area.
We recommend that the town advance the Lost Lake Sewer project before we lose the 0% interest loan. In addition, we recommend that the town support the project by providing 50% of the funds, similar to the town center sewer project. In our view this project is inevitable and the price tag is only going to get higher. We encourage all interested residents to attend the Board of Selectman’s meeting on Monday, December 3, at which time the Lost Lake sewer project will be on the agenda.
Angela Garger, Redskin Trail
Carol Quinn, Ridgewood Road




I have to take issue with a couple of points that were being made in this letter. It states that “the town has taken no corrective action which would have lessened the nutrient loading of the lake”. While it is indeed true that the ‘town’ has done nothing, it is untrue that nothing has been done. A large percentage of the homeowners on Lost Lake and Knopps Pond have repaired and replaced their faulty septic systems since these tests were taken many decades ago. Because of this, along with the fact that no upstream testing from Martins Pond Brook were ever done, deems it 100% necessary that current tests be performed to determine if there is nutrient loading happening, and to determine the true cause of it.
As far as funding goes, if the project is deemed necessary with current tests that include upstream testing, why wouldn’t the town, along with the four corners commercial district, pick up 100% of the cost if the project benefits the entire town based on it keeping the town water supply viable? The town, including the lake residents, is picking up the tab on the $8M fire station, just like the town, including the lake residents, picked up the tab when the new High School was built.
I can understand a usage fee, but the residents of Lost Lake should not be forced to cover the lions share of the project plus hook up fees plus usage fees. Oh, and why should the usage fees be measured at our private wells, as opposed to at our sewage pump or some other outflow point? Is it fair to charge people for using their own water to drink, to water thier lawns and gardens or to wash their vehicles when none of this water ends up in the sewer? Not to mention the fact that the $3000 grinder pump will need replacing every 10 years at the expense of the homeowner.
Lost Lake is the least affluent area in Groton and it receives the least town services by a long shot, yet is the most heavily taxed. If this project moves forward, now would be the time for the town to set things right. As a town we talk a good game about ‘community’ so let’s prove it is not simply talk, but that we actually mean it.